Saturday, August 28, 2010

Match-fixer pockets £150k as he rigs England Test at Lord's

Match-fixer pockets £150k as he rigs England Test at Lord's


News of the World smashes multi-million pound cricket match-fixing scandal

Image Flag

THE News of the World has smashed a multi-million pound cricket match-fixing ring which RIGGED the current Lord's Test between England and Pakistan.

READ TOMORROW'S NEWS OF THE WORLD FOR MORE REVELATIONS
READ TOMORROW'S NEWS OF THE WORLD FOR MORE REVELATIONS

In the most sensational sporting scandal ever, bowlers Mohammad Amir and Mohammad Asif delivered THREE blatant no-balls to order.

Their London-based fixer Mazhar Majeed, who let us in on the betting scam for £150,000, crowed "this is no coincidence" before the bent duo made duff deliveries at PRECISELY the moments promised to our reporter.

Armed with our damning dossier of video evidence, Scotland Yard launched their own probe into the scandal.

CHECK BACK LATER TO VIEW DAMNING VIDEO EVIDENCE

Millions around the world watched Pakistan star bowlers Mohammad Amir and Mohammad Asif deliver three no-balls in the Test against England on Thursday and Friday at the historic home of cricket, Lord's in London.

Unsuspecting fans packed the ground yesterday to watch Pakistan collapse as they were bowled out for 74 in their first innings and forced to follow on.

CAUGHT: Fixer Majeed beckons to our man to begin the £150,000 handover
CAUGHT: Fixer Majeed beckons to our man to begin the £150,000 handover

But today our shock footage of the players' fixer Mazhar Majeed taking a massive £150,000 cash, and telling us EXACTLY when the no-balls would come, proves the game was RIGGED.

Having already trousered a £10,000 upfront deposit - which he insisted had gone to the stars - Majeed sat in our west London hotel room at the Copthorne Tara on Wednesday night and eagerly counted out the £140,000 balance in bundles of crisp £50 notes - our "entry ticket" into his already successful betting scam.

Our undercover team was posing as front men for a Far East gambling cartel. In return for their suitcase of money Majeed then calmly detailed what would happen - and when - on the field of play next day, as a taster of all the lucrative information he could supply in future.

He promised: "I'm going to give you three no-balls to prove to you firstly that this is what's happening. They've all been organised, okay?

"This is EXACTLY what's going to happen, you're going to SEE these three things happen. I'm telling you, if you play this right you're going to make a lot of money, believe me!"

LEFT TO RIGHT: Bowler Asif, skipper Butt, bowler Amir, keeper Akmal
LEFT TO RIGHT: Bowler Asif, skipper Butt, bowler Amir, keeper Akmal

We can sensationally reveal Majeed identified young Pakistan captain Salman Butt as the ringleader of the band of cheats. He also named wicket keeper Kamran Akmal and boasted he had a total of SEVEN corrupt cricketers in his pocket, all banking huge sums from bookies and betting syndicates.

The scam, fuelled by greed, is a betrayal by the players not only of their sport but of their cricket-crazy homeland.

COUNTING IT OUT: Fixer tots cash up bundle by bundle
COUNTING IT OUT: Fixer tots cash up bundle by bundle

As millions back home in Pakistan struggle against hunger and disease amid devastating floods, the cheats were defiling the reputation of Lord's and lining their own pockets.

In a meeting with our investigators puppet-master Majeed:

  • BRAGGED that the scam is rife and future games against England this summer are already earmarked for cheating.
  • CONFESSED his match-fixing round the world had netted customers MILLIONS.
  • REVEALED how he oversees cheating by using no-balls, specifying how many runs will be scored or conceded in certain overs, with signals such as changing gloves to confirm the fix is on.
  • ADMITTED he abuses his position as owner of non-league Croydon FC to launder his illicit gains.

At one stage Majeed told us our syndicate could make "absolutely millions, millions" by paying him up to £450,000 a time for info on matches, then placing bets on the fixedoutcome. And he tried to excuse the players' shameful behaviour, claiming: "These poor boys need to. They're paid peanuts." Majeed said he had even opened Swiss bank accounts for them to hide their ill-gotten gains. We launched our investigation two weeks ago after a tip-off. The Pakistan side has long been dogged by match- fixing allegations. Only today has the full shocking extent been laid bare.

MOMENT THAT SHAMED GAME: Star bowler Amir delivers Friday's promised no-ball
MOMENT THAT SHAMED GAME: Star bowler Amir delivers Friday's promised no-ball

Property tycoon Majeed, 35, has a £1.8 million home in Surrey and is a familiar face at cricket grounds around the world. We infiltrated his criminal network posing as wealthy businessmen on the make.

Majeed turned up for our first meeting on Monday, August 16, at the Hilton in London's Park Lane, dressed in jeans and a sweater. He immediately started bragging of his connections with the Pakistani team. "I manage ten of the players," he told us. "I do all their affairs like contracts, sponsorship, marketing, everything. I work very closely with the PCB (Pakistan Cricket Board)."

Our reporters told him they wanted to organise their own Twenty20 tournament in the Middle East. Majeed claimed he would be able to provide his players for the right fee. When our man assured Majeed the players would do well out of it, he immediately said with a wink: "I know what you're talking about because I know what goes on!" Majeed then hinted at the extent of cheating in the game. . .

REPORTER: "If there's two or three that are on for the other side, the betting side, then good luck - they'll be really happy."

MAJEED: "There's more than two or three. Believe me. It's already set up. That's already there. I'm very wary speaking about this simply because I don't know you guys. I've been dealing with these guys for seven years, okay? Who we deal with and how we deal with it is very, very important. This is the main thing. I'm only dealing with certain people. How we do it and what we do is very, very crucial."

REPORTER: "You're already dealing with another party on this matter? Give us some tips as well if you've got any. Happy to cut us in?"

MAJEED: "Yeah I'll give you tips."

REPORTER: "If there's anything we need to know in the forthcoming match let me know. Happy to pay."

Majeed said he was worried our men could be wearing tape recorders and he would check them out before going further.

IT'S A DEAL: Satisfied Majeed puts money back in case
IT'S A DEAL: Satisfied Majeed puts money back in case

Two days later at the Bombay Brasserie Indian restaurant in central London, Majeed told us we had begun to gain his trust. He had spent the day at the Oval where Pakistan bowled England out for 233 on the first day of the third Test. After a trusted source vouched for our credentials, Majeed relaxed and laid his cards on the table. . .

MAJEED: "I do feel that I can speak to you about this, okay? Now, yes. . . there is very big money in it."

REPORTER: "There's still? I know there was, but they clamped down on match fixing I heard."

MAJEED: "They've toned down match fixing a lot, yeah. They've made it very, very difficult. These guys won't deal with just anybody. The only reason they'll deal with me is because they know I'm professional, they've known me for years.

"I've been doing it with them, the Pakistani team, for about 2½ years. And we've made masses and masses of money." Later that night Majeed boasted how it was the players who got HIM into match-fixing. He told us: "The players would never tell anybody else. They were the ones who actually approached me about this. This is the beauty of it.

"I was friends with them for four, five years and then they said this happens. I said really?"

OVER: Majeed leaves with the cash that fixed Lord's Test
OVER: Majeed leaves with the cash that fixed Lord's Test

Majeed then described how the betting scam operates. He reached into a carrier bag, pulled out a white BlackBerry phone and flicked through a series of messages.

"I deal with an Indian party," he said. "They pay me for the information." Then Majeed explained how many cricket bets are placed on what he called "brackets" - events happening in a group of 10 overs.

If players score well in the first three overs punters would be likely to bet on that continuing for the next seven. But if the fixed players then deliberately STOP scoring or slow down, anybody in on it can "make a killing", said Majeed. The same happens with bowlers giving away runs or throwing no-balls.

Not only is Majeed's information invaluable to syndicates involved in spread betting - where wagers are staked on a range of possible outcomes - it is also golddust for shady bookies looking to manipulate the odds in their favour.

The following night - Thursday August 19 - Majeed demanded £10,000 then revealed to us there would be two no-balls in the following day's Oval play.

That fix was cancelled on the day. So was a promised maiden over by captain Salman Butt on the Saturday - final day of the Test England lost. But days later - with our extra £140,000 in his hands - he delivered the promised goods at Lord's.

Last night a Scotland Yard spokesman said: "Following information from the News of the World we have today arrested a 35-year-old man on suspicion of conspiracy to defraud bookmakers."

Scotland Yard officers last night visited Lord's and the Pakistan players' London hotel. Police are set to speak to the players today and will liaise with officials from the International Cricket Commission and the Pakistan Cricket Board.

The man responsible for disciplinary repercussions is Sri Lankan match referee Ranjan Madugalle, 51, who could impose fines or bans.

But in an extreme case such as this it is likely he will hand over to ICC chief Harron Lorgat to decide if the game should be abandoned.

Post Via

Thursday, May 27, 2010

Planes, trains or automobiles? A summer travel primer

In many cases, you may be able to save by hopping on a bus or  train, or driving yourself. But keep in mind that what you save in  money, you'll spend in time.

In many cases, you may be able to save by hopping on a bus or train, or driving yourself.
But keep in mind that what you save in money, you'll spend in time
You may have heard that airfares are expensive this summer. Capacity cuts and increased demand combine to make a lethal combo for travelers looking for a bargain. But will you get a better deal if you forego a flight and take to the road instead?

In many cases, you may be able to save by hopping on a bus or train, or driving yourself. But keep in mind that what you save in money, you'll spend in time. In the case of summer vacations, then, the question becomes what's more valuable to you—your budget or your schedule?

I looked at three (relatively) short trips for summer sojourners: Boston to New York City, Los Angeles to Las Vegas, and Indianapolis to chicago . I priced out airfare, bus fare, train tickets, and road-trip fuel costs, and also calculated the amount of time each respective travel method would take. Each scenario shows round-trip per-person costs, including all taxes and fees. Estimated duration times are each-way. For the fuel test comparisons, I checked prices on AAA's Fuel cost calculator using a 2005 Honda Civic as an example. The results came in as follows:

Route: Boston/New York
Flight Price/Duration: $123/1h 20m
Train Price/Duration: $98/4h 10m (NE Regional), $221/3h 35m (Acela)
Bus Price/Duration: $19/4h 15m
Fuel Price/Duration: $42/3h 40m

Route: Los Angeles/Las Vegas
Flight Price/Duration: $130/1h
Train Price/Duration: No train option
Bus Price/Duration: $60/5h 45m
Fuel Price/Duration: $54/4h 20m

Route: Indianapolis/Chicago
Flight Price/Duration: $156/1h
Train Price/Duration: $56/5h 5m
Bus Price/Duration: $28/3h 15m
Fuel Price/Duration: $35/3h 6m

In the above examples, driving yourself came in cheapest for the Los Angeles to Las Vegas experiment. The bus was best for the Boston to New York and Indianapolis to Chicago trips. Additionally, note that if more people are joining you, a self-drive trip might work out to be more economical than the other options, as you'll have several people to split the cost of fuel. But with each of these, you'll be spending significantly more time in transit.

Beyond the test data, here are other items to consider: For air travel, factor in fees for baggage and other services, time spent at the airport, possible weather delays, and the cost of transportation to and from the airport. For road trips with your own car, you'll want to consider traffic, toll costs, and general wear-and-tear on your vehicle. In every case, you'll want to take your personal comfort into account. Are you a traveler who hates coach-class seating? If so, you'll probably prefer train travel or taking your own car. Can you not stand sitting in traffic? Skip buses and driving and instead hop on a plane or train.

Then there are more minor, but still important, factors. Driving your own car allows you to blast your music, make fuel and food stops at your own discretion, and change plans en route in response to traffic, weather conditions, etc. Taking a bus, train, or plane gives you less freedom, but more down time during the actual traveling—no stressful behind-the-wheel situations here; for the most part you can pop on your MP3 player, grab a snack, and (hopefully) enjoy the trip. For these differing types of travel (and their related costs), choosing your method of transport is truly a value judgment.

As noted earlier, how you interpret the data is going to be different for every traveler. Let's use me as an example. Years ago, as a college student, I would have gone with the bus for most short-haul travel—it's cheap, safe, and the travel time isn't too restrictive for a weekend getaway. Nowadays, while I still take the bus from time to time, I might spring for the train or a plane if I want a little more comfort while traveling, or more time at my destination. Conversely, a family of five might find a road trip much more affordable (and manageable) than corralling kids on a plane. And a business traveler, who's just spending a few hours in her destination, may exclusively fly to make the most of her time.

If you're planning a short-haul trip this summer and have several transportation options to choose from, conduct your own experiments to see which provides the best value to you.